Why our data is different

Most security datasets are scraped or hand-labeled once and go stale. Ours are generated and verified by shipping detection systems: the deobfuscation engine, the split-brain harness, the unicode-interference and glyph-integrity validators. Every sample carries a provenance record and a machine verdict, so the labels are reproducible rather than anecdotal.

What we can build.

๐Ÿงฌ

Prompt-injection & jailbreak corpora

Adversarial instruction-override, authority-impersonation, and multi-turn escalation samples, graded by the split-brain harness across single- and multi-turn contexts.

๐Ÿ”ก

Obfuscation & encoding-evasion sets

Homoglyph, base64, Morse, zero-width, and leet transformations paired with clean originals โ€” labeled by the deobfuscate engine for round-trip recoverability.

๐Ÿ–ผ๏ธ

Multimodal image-injection samples

Text hidden in images โ€” white-on-white, sub-pixel fonts, alpha overlays, EXIF, QR โ€” extracted and scored by deobfuscate-vision. For training and stress-testing vision-language models.

๐Ÿˆถ

CJK glyph-integrity data

Malformed, spoofed, and coherence-broken CJK glyphs from the glyph-validator, for multilingual data-integrity and tokenizer-robustness work.

๐Ÿ“‘

Custom red-team corpora

Built to your threat model, your domain, and your target model โ€” with a documented generation pipeline and a held-out verification split.

New training & evaluation methods.

Beyond data, we develop the methods that make it useful โ€” approaches that come out of our own security research.

๐Ÿง 

Split-brain classification

Dual-hemisphere reconciliation: two independent lenses reach a verdict and a superposition-collapse probe resolves disagreement โ€” a training and evaluation pattern for robust security classifiers.

โš–๏ธ

Witness-graded refusal scoring

Refusals and interventions graded against a tamper-evident witness log, so a model's safety behavior can be measured against a defensible ground-truth record rather than a static rubric.

๐Ÿ”ฌ

Provenance-anchored labeling

Every training sample is tied to the detector, version, and verdict that produced it. Reproducible labels, auditable pipelines, and clean train/verify separation.

How an engagement works

Tell us what you're training.

Whether you need an off-the-shelf adversarial split or a bespoke corpus and method for a specific model, we can scope it. One short intake gets it moving.

Start a dataset intake